Isn’t it time designed for Alot more Faculty Football Bowl Games?

Americans just cannot get enough of football on television.

According to a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Even though ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, countless viewers keep watching, even when oahu is the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a casino game that drew just 20,256 fans last week but attracted the average television audience of 1,114,000, in accordance with ESPN.”

Schrotenboer continues on to state, “Only one bowl game last year drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers typically, in accordance with Nielsen. That’s better compared to the 1.1 million who watched a beginning day baseball game last year between the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”

Is it possible to imagine then the following scenario for the college football bowl season:

ESPN builds a unique television studio strictly for the goal of hosting college bowl games. The tv network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In this way, it does not have any middleman to deal with for these additional events, eliminating being forced to negotiate with a separate facility to host the game. No costs for having to drive production trailers or fly technical crews halfway across the country.

Since this facility could be built as a television studio and not being an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN might make attending the bowl game a real multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee as well as the television viewer to be unlike any other.

But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio could have just a limited number of seats, say 5,000 or less, which would minimize construction costs. The studio would not must be much bigger than the common college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough to exhibit to the million plus viewers that there are actually some fans in the stands ดูบอลสด.Thus, there wouldn’t be a single bad seat in the house. You’d rest assured an up-close and personal bowl experience. And because of the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate throughout the facility.

Because of the limited method of getting seats, this may force ticket demand (and prices) up. No further 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities that are less than a quarter full. It will be a 180-degree vary from the present experience, in which many schools need to count on daily deal sites to help unload their share of allocated tickets.

Thus, the universities would benefit simply because they wouldn’t be required to buy the 1000s of tickets they cannot sell (even on Groupon).

ESPN could utilize this facility multiple times through the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.

For example, in 2010 five additional college football teams qualified for a dish that they were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network aren’t generating countless dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they would much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers would prefer to be buying time on a television program that a lot of viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.

Schrotenboer states, “Schools, coaches and players also are interested – going to a dish game means more possible donations, more television exposure, more practice time and more bonus money.”


Leave a Reply